Heh heh - a touch, a touch, I do confess. But in that case, somebody had better tell Chris Smith to axe the Whacko Liberal category from his spectrum. Not Catholic, after all! ;-)
(And I suppose that I'd better add that I'm not a sede myself, although I can certainly understand why people of good faith would be inclined to go that route. I fit more into the rad-trad category above, with FSSP somehow in the place of SSPX.)
I like that the radical traditionalist is described as most catholic :)
ReplyDeleteI'm tellin' ya, sedes can't get no respect. SSPX as ultima Thule indeed! Harrumph and p'tui.
ReplyDeleteWell the question for sedes is can one reject the pope and still be Catholic? The SSPX, for all their stubbornness, at least admit he exists.
DeleteWell, I'd say that they can be at least as Catholic as the choice-noosphere guys on the other end!
DeleteI agree entirely!
DeleteHeh heh - a touch, a touch, I do confess. But in that case, somebody had better tell Chris Smith to axe the Whacko Liberal category from his spectrum. Not Catholic, after all! ;-)
Delete(And I suppose that I'd better add that I'm not a sede myself, although I can certainly understand why people of good faith would be inclined to go that route. I fit more into the rad-trad category above, with FSSP somehow in the place of SSPX.)